![]() If you are lazy and just want to watch a movie, or know a group did a good job on the encode and don't want to do the encode yourself, then get the x264 rip. %100 identical that you can burn back to media? image.ĭo you want to do the encode yourself to get what you perceive to be the best quality? Get the remux or image. A competent encode might bring that down to 10-12GB and have almost no noticeable loss of quality to you (depends on your eyes). Example: a Bluray might span almost 50GB (say 40GB for the video/audio alone). Typically the best overall value for filesize to image quality ratio. Handy if you like to burn back to your own media, or like to encode movies yourself to get the quality you want.Ģ64 or x264: Compressed from source. These are %100 (minus DRM) untouched copies of the source disc. While sometimes in raw structure, images are typically in. There would be no compression done to the video or audio streams. A BD-Remux would typically (not always) be from the original m2ts into a mkv container. Ffmpeg is an audio/video encoding tool and it can handle multiple tasks. Hopefully that will let me encode at about 35fps - 40fps depending on the settings I use.Remux: Taking the original format and changing the container it's in. Method 4: Harness Ffmpeg to remux MKV to MP4. I may consider getting an Intel i9 Gulftown 6 core CPU if I decide to encode Blu-Ray movies. The point of this post is, if you want to encode Blu-Ray movies using x.264, then you better have a powerful PC to cut down on time. At that rate it would take 9 hours for the 1st pass and another 9 hours for the 2nd pass for a total of 18 hours to encode a "Blu-Ray movie". Needless to say my average of roughly 45fps dropped to an average of 6.5fps during the course of a 30 minute test run. I also upped the bitrate to 8,000 just for the hell of it. I don't have a Blu-Ray drive, but I decided to simulate encoding "Blu-Ray resolution" content by upping the resolution of a DVD movie to the resolution it would be in Blu-Ray format. ![]() Intel CPUs are generally better than AMD CPUs when it comes to video encoding, however they are generally a little more expensive. The x.264 is multi-thread and it will definitely scale up in performance the more cores the CPU has. The PC in my sig encodes at about 45 frames per second based on the setting I use to encode DVDs. I use Handbrake to encode and there are a number of options to get better video quality, this comes with a performance penalty though. As a result, the only thing it changed during the process is the container. There are also a lot of ways to tweak how the movie is encoded. When it operating to remux, the content of the video (or the audio) wont be altered. Of course you should experiment with different movie to determine what is the best generic bitrate to use. I make the general statement that you should set the bitrate to between 1,400 to 1,600. The best you can hope for is that there will be no visible quality loss. ![]() That is by definition a quality-sacrificing process. I've encoded a fair amount of DVD movies to MKV, I won't recommend a target file size since it is dependent on the length of the movie. You are not talking about remuxing, but about re-encoding video from one lossy format to another lossy format AND your goal is to save disk space. If you want to upscale to 1080p, use ffdshow to do this at playback time, it will save you a lot of storage space and ffdshow has some very high quality rescalers available. mkv files doesn't work all that well, but perhaps support for this has improved recently it'd be basically the same process, use DGDecode to demux. Also consider re-encoding any TrueHD or DTS-HD audio, at least as a secondary track, since it's not very well supported on PC playback.Īnd DVD is 480p. ![]() However I believe eac3to has a one-click method to do this, so you might want to give that a look. It's been a while since I've done this, but I believe you can use tsMuxer in 'Demux' mode to get the video and audio streams out, then load these into MKVmerge and mux directly to a. You just need to get the streams into a container with better PC support. 'Iron.5.1-FGT' I just watched the whole movie twice (both released), on my OLED TV 55' (2,2m from the tv) and I could not spot the difference I also tried to watch close, like 1 meters from the tv, also tried to pause during explosions and action scenes, and could not spot any bad encoding pixel thingy. The formats for video in BluRay and HD-DVD are standard and fairly well supported, with the majority using h.264. If you don't want to re-encode and are okay with the 20-40GB size of a typical BluRay, all you need to do is demultiplex the main video, audio and subtitle streams and then remultiplex them into your container of choice (.mkv).
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |